Republican committee keeps heat on Obama

yeah you hate mongering repubs...hahahaha

Laughing at everything you post is creepy.  If you actually said something ironic or funny, maybe, but as it is, embarrassing for you.  And your hate is almost acrid.

Tell me something why do I bother you? Don't read my posts... I am not laughing at MY posts Oh friend of mine......Where is the hate. You haven't gotten back to me....Friends list???hahaha oh sorry creepy

Hey you ... the guy behind the curtain ... why do you see this as "hard left BS"?  They gave coverage to the RNC, if they were so left leaning they would have ignored these pointless statements by the Really Nasty Crew.  You are not making sense Mr. GO.

Why are you here if that is true?

Oz, go read FOX and quit wasting our time.

Not "fair and balanced" like Fox News eh?  LOL!

And some of them have 'pardons' waiting for them next week! 

And while we are at it, can we

• just slap the smack out of all of those in the senate who stood up and applauded Ted Stevens after his goodbye speech.....argh!
• send gwb to prison (in Iraq) and to trial for murder
• dick cheney should go to Guantanamo for the rest of his lousy life
• alberto gonzalez should be his cell mate (wife)
• rumsfeld should have a weapon of mass destruction where the sun don't shine
• scooter should go to prison, period
• craig should have to clean toilets for the rest of his life
• and Sarah, well, let's get her a dream vacation to Russia (one way ticket)

Shhh .. don't give the RNC any ideas about being positive and uplifting, they just might make a comeback someday.

Attention RNC ... ignore Suval ... continue to use Karl Rove tactics.  They worked great in 2000 and 2004, it was just a minor hiccup in 2008 ... it will work again.  Really, it will, trust me.

It's funny that the RNC is demanding that Obama stay in the center, "as America wants," yet the conclusion they draw from their recent defeat is that they didn't go far enough right.  Republicans need to do some serious introspection about their own standards and quit worrying about the winning team.  Republicans are trying to capture that 10% of the far right vote and sacrificing the 30% in the middle.  The middle group aren't "centrists."  They're moderates who don't care about ideology, they just want to wake up in the morning and have a job to and they don't care what someone else is doing in their own bedroom.

Did you come up with this after you and your wife licked the platter clean?

Funny how you twisted things around, it appears that the RNC is the one who didn't get the memo that the election is over.  Go back to a Fox News forum JS.

What has PE Obama accomplished in the past 30 days?

what was he supposed to accomplish while watching dubbya do nothing kick him out and say he cant wait sorry he has to wait till 1/20 all he can do is pick his cabinet posts

Rarddogg, My question was posed to Noelle.  She made the statement  that we should recognize Obamas accomplishments in the last 30 days.  My question was to state what the accomplishments were.

Understand now?

The point is: they can flap all they want, but nobody cares!

Its not the faces of the people who need to change, it is the policy and practices that need to change. I know that I have had jobs where I am happy to get a new boss because I don't have to continue to do the same stupid stuff under the direction of the old boss.  Hmmm......

I am confused and disappointed.  Barack said no lobbyists.  Why has be gone back on that and putting lobbyists in his cabinet?  I was beginning to feel good about him, but it's appearing as though the change he talked about so very much isn't really materializing. 

Show me the quote in which he states that there would be no lobbyists.  He said that lobbyists would no longer run the show. 

It seems just like the same old common garden variety we have mostly experienced from past Presidents.  I had high hopes, now I don't feel so good about this anymore. 

How about waiting to see what happens once he takes office? 

There just doesn't seem anything really new here.  Maybe, my expectations were too high.

It seems that your expectations were based on what you wanted to hear, not what Obama said.

Not that I am big fan of Fox News but they are the highest rated news.  MSNBC is the lowest rated. 

Hey Ozark - Have you even listened to AM talk radio?   What I find most amazing is the criticism of anybody who questions Obama.  Rush (which is the radio host you are obviously referring to) very rarely says anything that is hateful.  In fact, most of the time he just talks about hateful things dems say.  Oh, and by the way, he plays the audio of the dems statements and posts his sources on his website.  He has nothing to hide.  Why don't you take one hour out of your life and listen before you criticize him?  You claim to be a Christian, yet you voted for a man who didn't see anything wrong with living babies not getting medical attention to keep them alive (For those who can't figure it out, a failed abortion is the same as a living baby).  That is the same as murder under any definition.  

an illegal war is the same thing as murder under any definition but the GOP

Hey rarddogg - Sorry, I must have misunderstood.  You mean the same war that dems voted for?  No, its not illegal and no, its not murder.  We have a volunteer military fighting others who volunteered to fight.  Nope, not even close to baby murder. 

Rarddogg the war in Iraq was approved by a joint Bi-partisan resolution of Congress.  Your rantings are without fact.

You really need to do your homework and stop parroting.  Reagan was the king of deregulation, it was almost his holy grail.  Check it out.

Whether you like it or not, Clinton was a very good President.  His post-term assessments are extremely high even among conservative scholars.  Only hypocrites who had no business involving themselves in a personal matter between a husband and wife or insecure people who were intimidated by his intelligence and charisma continue to smear his Presidency.

Read New York Times Article 11/23/08-The Reckoning about the fall of CitiGroup.
I am neither Dem or Rep in fact I wouldn't vote or live in the States ever by choice.
Clinton was and is a SLEAZBALL CROOK!
And you better do your Homework!

Since you brought up "The Reckoning" I also suggest you read the other segments about Henry Paulson and cox Changing the banking rules and then come back and talk about sleazbags.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/03/business/03sec.html?_r=2&scp=8&sq=The%20Reckoning&st=cse&oref=slogin

Also note, since you would bring up the banks and the debacle, that Citicorp CEO, Goldman CO, Lehman CEO, JP Morgan/Chase CEO, Former AIG CEO.......ALL REPUBLICANS!

They are ALL Sleazballs!But,that does not change the Fact that the Clinton administration Deregulated the financial markets leading the WORLD to where we
are today.

You do understand of course that the deregulation bill was a Republican product

"The bills were introduced in the U.S. Senate by Phil Gramm (R-Texas) and in the U.S. House of Representatives by Jim Leach (R-Iowa). The third lawmaker associated with the bill was Rep. Thomas J. Bliley, Jr. (R-Va), Chairman of the House Commerce Committee from 1995 to 2001. ^[2] On May 6, 1999, the Senate passed the bills by a 54-44 vote along party lines (53 Republicans and one Democrat in favor; 44 Democrats opposed).^[3] On July 20, the House passed a different version of the bill on an uncontested and uncounted voice vote. When the two chambers could not agree on a joint version of the bill, the House voted on July 30 by a vote of 241-132 (R 58-131; D 182-1) to instruct its negotiators to work for a law that ensured that consumers enjoyed medical and financial privacy and also "robust competition and equal and non-discriminatory access to financial services and economic opportunities in their communities" (i.e. protection against exclusionary redlining) ^{[4] [5]} The bill then moved to a conference committee to work out the differences between the Senate and House versions. Democrats agreed to support the bill after Republicans agreed to strengthen provisions of the anti-redlining Community Reinvestment Act and address certain privacy concerns; the conference committee then finished its work by the beginning of November.^{[4] [6]} On November 4, the final bill resolving the differences was passed by the Senate 90-8 ^[7] and by the House 362-57.^[8] This legislation was signed into law by Democratic President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999.^[9]"

Signed into law by President Bill Clinton on Nov 12,1999!

You are just a very little personality and extremely annoying.  FOX News is the most right wing conservative tabloid news in the country and they express their pride of their position all the time.  Accept it, embrace it.  And just read your own posts and see how hateful and nasty die hard, republican lemmings continue to be.

First, Obama would never jump of the bridge, he'd see that it was in good working order.  Second, you present yourself as the zealous followers of the far right.  Third, liberal isn't a dirty word, the founders of our republic were the first US liberals.

Oh cyn I have missed you where have you been? I am not a Republican are you a die hard liberal? What is it about the mostly questions I have asked that have yet to be answered, make me a hater? I don't follow any party Honey, do you? You present yourself exactly as I have posted.  Hypocrite?????  attacking has become a new form torture for the liberal  as you put zealots! HA see it is a double edged sword...

 Oh by the way can I be on you freinds list..hahahaha Please really I mean it????

No she can follow!

Ron, you are making yourself appear very shallow.  Just as dems have had good and bad presidents and leaders at all levels of the government, so do Republicans.  We have not had too many real conservatives to vote for.  If you really study the conservative principals, you'd probably agree with most of what you learned.  Don't be close-minded to another conservative.  Just as I need to give Obama a chance (which admittedly I am struggling with), you will need to someday give a Republican a chance. 

We all need to figure out a way to come together and support what is good and question what is bad regardless of which party is in charge a the time.  I can personally guarantee you MILLIONS of Republicans questioned Bush.  Don't follow blindly behind anybody but also be willing to give people you may not totally agree with a chance.

Ahhhh, so that's your reason and excuse for your spewing.  Got it.

My "kind of mentality" is exactly what this country needs in order to succeed. It is the kind of mentality that will never again allow an election to be stolen, our country to go to war based on lies, the needless deaths of over four thousand American soldiers, the suppression of the middle-class, and an economy brought to the brink of collapse. It is the kind of mentality that will never again allow fools and ideologues to bring about all of the above.

I hope all of you Repugs sleep well at night.

cyn, read my posts and point out some instances please.  Otherwise, don't flap your left wing too hard at me.  OK?

You pretend to carry on civil discourse without resorting to hate-mongering, but you just can't help slipping in the name-calling and snide comments.  You aren't, by chance, a libertarian?

Yeah that harry reid and nancy pelosi dennis KU whatever Jo Biden Ted kennedy shall I go on Oh yeah Emanuelle Barbra boxer they really know how to work with the other side.. ......Once again I laugh..hahhhahahahaha Regime do you know what the word means?

I find it very funny how you want the repugs as you say to just get in line and follow us. I suggest you do a little more reading on the Internet it is at the tip of your fingers. And find out who has not been playing fair. Google might be a good start

Ohhh...You mean like "You're eithr with us, or you're against us"??  You mean that famous line from George bush? And if someone was against, they were investigated, lied about, vilanised, and considered unamerican....look at Valerie Plame....she gets outted at the CIA...George Bush makes this big blustery speech about whoever leaked ges fired.....and now we find out from his own ex-press secretary...he's the one that authorized the leak!!  He didn't resign now did he?

O please I am pointing the finger the other way there is plenty of blame to go around . Valerie Plame was not active but you know it doesn't mater to print the whole truths. I never once on any of these sites said that I agreed with pres bush 100% of the time. I am not against the Democratic Party as a whole.  I am amazed by the hypocrisy. 

I have also said CLREARLY that I want the new pres Obama to do a great job.

So tell me what sold you about Obama? I really want to know.

Thanks

Are these more of your reasonable facts?  US Grant and Dwight Eisenhower had no political experience.  James Garfield, Harding, Harrison (both), Hoover, Kennedy and Abraham Lincoln all had less experience than PE Obama.  Looks like you failed again.

Wow you out smart us all the time Whoa!!! So answer my question I put to This person. What about Obama made you want him in office?

If you look back at my posts I have said very possitivly that I want my new president to do a great job. I respect him as my pres. I have only pointed out truths that made me uncomfortable with him. I have not slandered him. I am respecting him. Can you say the same about our sitting president?

You are respecting him?  Now its my turn to use your favorite response...hahahahahah

If that is respect then you need some remedial education. 

I voted for Obama because he is intelligent, has the best interests of the Country and its citizens - not just people who agree with him and have ignored the 4th, 5th, 6th and 8th Amendments, his commitment to return our Constitutional rights, he is committed to have the BEST people to advise him, his health care, tax relief, defense - like providing the same level of benefits for reservists and National Guard, to put more effort into the war in Afghanistan, having Iraq pay for their own war, and his energy proposals.  Also his desire for work with our allies  and have them more responsible for international security, and his plan to renew a positive dialog with other world leaders. 

"I know we will say nice things about the president and his family who took ill..... Please my little lemmings.."  Right, boo, this is respectful. 

I haven't slander the sitting President, everything I have said is factual and he has damaged his own reputation. 

It doesn't matter why you have to laugh most of the time, its just creepy that you feel the need.

Oh yes you have. Bush baby? You have continued your attacks and many without a basis in fact. oh excuse me you know nothing  Lemmings follow blindly was making a point about his followers. 

 What pray tell did you lose in the bill of rights????? Another baseless thing thrown out there.  I do not believe that Obama has the best intentions for our country but that is my right.    How would you know anything about the war in Iraq and Afghanistan they don't say much on all  the channels. Oh I'm forgetting that you have the high IQ that you like d to throw around??? I am glad that you answered me at least. So thanks

Like the no name calling that you are using bush babies, and now I am illiterate. you just keep it up.  just so you know BUSH was elected it is a fact. Why cant you get over that fact.

Once again I must point out, what are you talking about the national gaurd bennis? Bush took those too? You throw so many balls out there it is hard to keep up with you.

I am glad that you looked up who you voted for the campaign ran wonderfully on this.

Different time, different era.  Stop flapping that left wing at me so hard.  It was acknowleged during the campaign that he is the MOST inexperienced candidate to run for the office in MODERN times.  G away and bother someone else.

See, there you go again. 

Here is some unsolicited advice that might serve you in the future.  You are not as smart as you would like to think.  Not everyone is dumber than you.